Equivalent Expressions For $-32^{\frac{3}{5}}$ A Comprehensive Guide

by Scholario Team 69 views

In the realm of mathematics, particularly when dealing with exponents and roots, understanding the equivalence of different expressions is crucial. This article delves into the expression −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}} and explores its equivalent forms. We will dissect the components of the expression, apply relevant mathematical principles, and methodically evaluate the given options to determine the correct answer. Our exploration will not only focus on identifying the equivalent expression but also on solidifying the underlying concepts of fractional exponents and their relationship with radicals. By the end of this discussion, you will have a comprehensive understanding of how to manipulate and simplify expressions involving fractional exponents.

Dissecting the Expression −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}}

To truly grasp the essence of the expression −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}}, it is paramount to break it down into its fundamental components. The expression comprises a negative sign, a base (-32), and a fractional exponent (35\frac{3}{5}). The fractional exponent plays a pivotal role in dictating the operation to be performed. Specifically, the denominator (5) signifies the index of the root, while the numerator (3) indicates the power to which the base should be raised. Therefore, −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}} can be interpreted as the negative of 32 raised to the power of 3/5. This further translates to finding the fifth root of 32, cubing the result, and then applying the negative sign. Understanding this decomposition is the key to navigating through the simplification process and identifying the equivalent expression.

The fractional exponent 35\frac{3}{5} can be rewritten using radicals. The denominator, 5, becomes the index of the radical, indicating a fifth root. The numerator, 3, signifies the power to which the base is raised before taking the root. Thus, 323532^{\frac{3}{5}} is equivalent to 3235\sqrt[5]{32^3} or (325)3(\sqrt[5]{32})^3. Both notations are mathematically valid and provide different pathways to simplification. The expression can be solved by first cubing 32 and then finding the fifth root, or by first finding the fifth root of 32 and then cubing the result. The latter approach is often simpler, as it deals with smaller numbers initially. The negative sign outside the base means we are taking the negative of the result, which is a crucial detail to consider when determining the final answer.

The base, 32, is a power of 2, specifically 252^5. Recognizing this is essential for simplifying the expression efficiently. When we have a power raised to another power, we multiply the exponents. In this case, we will be using the property (am)n=amâ‹…n(a^m)^n = a^{m \cdot n} extensively. By expressing 32 as 252^5, we can simplify the expression inside the radical more easily. The fifth root of 252^5 is simply 2, which makes the subsequent calculations more manageable. This conversion also helps to intuitively understand the magnitude of the result. It's a fundamental step in solving the problem and showcases the importance of recognizing powers and roots in mathematical simplification. Combining this knowledge with the understanding of fractional exponents, we are well-equipped to solve the expression step-by-step.

Evaluating the Options

Now that we have a solid grasp of the expression −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}}, let's meticulously evaluate each provided option to pinpoint the equivalent form. This involves applying the principles we've discussed and performing the necessary calculations to verify the equivalence.

Option A: −8-8

Option A proposes that −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}} is equivalent to −8-8. To verify this, we need to calculate the value of −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}} and compare it with -8. As we discussed earlier, −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}} can be rewritten as −(325)3-(\sqrt[5]{32})^3. We know that the fifth root of 32 is 2 (since 25=322^5 = 32). So, we have −(2)3-(2)^3, which simplifies to −8-8. Therefore, Option A holds true.

Option B: −3253-\sqrt[3]{32^5}

Option B suggests that −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}} is equivalent to −3253-\sqrt[3]{32^5}. This requires a careful analysis of how fractional exponents and radicals interact. The expression −3253-\sqrt[3]{32^5} can be rewritten as −(325)13-(32^5)^{\frac{1}{3}}, which simplifies to −3253-32^{\frac{5}{3}}. Comparing this to our original expression, −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}}, we see that the exponents are different (35\frac{3}{5} vs. 53\frac{5}{3}). Therefore, Option B is not equivalent to the original expression.

Option C: 13253\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{32^5}}

Option C presents the expression 13253\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{32^5}}. This can be rewritten as 13253\frac{1}{32^{\frac{5}{3}}}, which is equivalent to 32−5332^{-\frac{5}{3}}. This expression involves a negative exponent, indicating a reciprocal. However, the exponent's magnitude (53\frac{5}{3}) differs from the original expression's exponent (35\frac{3}{5}), and there is no negative sign associated with the base. Thus, Option C is not equivalent to −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}}.

Option D: 18\frac{1}{8}

Option D proposes the value 18\frac{1}{8}. This is a positive value, while our original expression −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}} evaluates to a negative value (-8). Therefore, Option D cannot be equivalent to the original expression. The negative sign is a crucial factor, and Option D fails to account for it.

The Correct Equivalent Expression

Based on our methodical evaluation, it is evident that Option A, −8-8, is the only expression equivalent to −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}}. We arrived at this conclusion by breaking down the original expression, understanding the role of the fractional exponent, and applying the properties of exponents and radicals. We meticulously examined each option, demonstrating why Options B, C, and D do not hold equivalence.

This exercise underscores the importance of understanding the interplay between exponents and roots, as well as the significance of the negative sign. The fractional exponent 35\frac{3}{5} acts as a bridge connecting exponential notation and radical notation, allowing us to express the same mathematical quantity in different forms. The negative sign, in this context, is an integral part of the expression and must be preserved throughout the simplification process.

The correct answer, −8-8, highlights how a fractional exponent can lead to a whole number result when the base is a perfect power. In this case, 32 is a perfect fifth power (252^5), which simplifies the fifth root calculation. The subsequent cubing operation and the application of the negative sign complete the evaluation, leading us to the final answer. This understanding is invaluable in simplifying and evaluating expressions involving fractional exponents.

In conclusion, after a thorough examination and step-by-step evaluation, we have definitively determined that the expression −3235-32^{\frac{3}{5}} is equivalent to -8. This exploration underscores the significance of understanding fractional exponents and their relationship with radicals. By dissecting the expression, applying the relevant mathematical principles, and meticulously evaluating each option, we've not only identified the correct answer but also reinforced the fundamental concepts involved. This detailed analysis serves as a valuable guide for simplifying and evaluating expressions with fractional exponents, ensuring a strong grasp of mathematical equivalence.